November 2
I’ve been cordially invited to join the visceral realists. I accepted, of course. There was no initiation ceremony. It was better that way.
BEFORE THE READING
![]()
Francisco Goldman, wmc, and Ken Levinson
![]()
David Rogers from Picador and
John McGhee from FSG
![]()
Michael Johnson, writer,
and Jeff Frederick, painter
![]()
Meanwhile, Fran Gordon makes a list.
![]()
. . . and waits for just a moment longer.
*
INTRODUCTIONS
![]()
Francisco Goldman talks about Bolaño . . .
![]()
. . . then introduces the readers.
*
THE READING
November 3
I’m not really sure what visceral realism is. I’m seventeen years old, my name is Juan García Madero, and I’m in my first semester of law school. I wanted to study literature, not law, but my uncle insisted, and in the end I gave in. I’m an orphan, and someday I’ll be a lawyer. That’s what I told my aunt and uncle, and then I shut myself in my room and cried all night. Or anyway for a long time. Then, as if it were settled, I started class in the law school’s hallowed halls, but a month later I registered for Julio César Álamo’s poetry workshop in the literature department, and that was how I met the visceral realists, or viscerealists or even vicerealists, as they sometimes like to call themselves.
I still don’t really get it. In one sense, the name of the group is a joke. At the same time, it’s completely in earnest. Many years ago there was a Mexican avant-garde group called the visceral realists, I think, but I don’tk now whether they were writers or painters or journalists or revolutionaries. They were active in the twenties or maybe the thirties, I’m not quite sure about that either. I’d obviously never heard of the group, but my ignorance in literary matters is to blame for that (every book in the world is out there waiting to be read by me).
According to Arturo Belano, the visceral realists vanished in the Sonora desert. Then Belano and Lima mentioned somebody called Cesárea Tinajero or Tinaja, I can’t remember which (I think it was when I was shouting to the waiter to bring us some beers), and they talked about the Comte de Lautréamont’s Poems, something in the Poems that had to do with this Tinajero woman, and then Lima made a mysterious claim. According to him, the present-day visceral realists walked backward. What do you mean, backward? I asked.
“Backward, gazing at a point in the distance, but moving away from it, walking straight toward the unknown.”
I said I thought this sounded like the perfect way to walk. The truth was I had no idea what he was talking about. If you stop and think about it, it’s no way to walk at all.
Belano shook my hand and told me that I was one of them now, and then we sang a ranchera. That was all. The song was about the lost towns of the north and a woman’s eyes. Before I went outside to throw up, I asked them whether the eyes were Cesárea Tinajero’s. Belano and Lima looked at me and said that I was clearly a visceral realist already and that together we would change Latin American poetry. At six in the morning I took another pesero, this time by myself, which brought me to Colonia Ladavista, where I live. Today I didn’t go to class. I spent the whole day in my room writing poems.
*
PANEL
Boullosa, Goldman, and Lago
discuss the impact of Bolaño
and the anticipation of 2666Lago: Borges and Bolaño are the same kind of writer. How? Borges writes such small, asexual stories, while Bolaño is bursting with sex and sprawling stories—but they are the same because they’re both original. Aura Estrada’s essay in Words Without Borders illustrates this perfectly . . . 2666 [Bolaño's next novel] is an imperfect perfect work. Like Philip K. Dick, Bolaño said, “Let me violate every single law of writing.” And as is said of Philip K. Dick: “He’s good even when he’s bad.”
Goldman: I read 2666 on my honeymoon. I couldn’t put it down. Sorry, dear!
Boullosa: Boom, magical realism—these are for foreigners. We didn’t care about that. I don’t even know whether Boom existed . . . I couldn’t read 2666 immdiately when he died. Then The Savage Detectives was erased from my consciousness after I read 2666, which makes blocks of narratives, none of them complete. The book is painful, astonishing, powerful, and visionary. Yes, it is perfect storytelling of imperfect, broken blocks.
*
AFTER THE READING
![]()
Greg of the Bronx, with
Paulina of Gramercy Park
and wmc, modeling
The Savage Detectives
![]()
Mr. X, Lorin Stein,
Fran Gordon, and Donald Antrim
![]()
Francisco Goldman and Maud Newton
*
February 3
Lupe told me that we’re the last visceral realists left in Mexico. I was lying on the floor, smoking, and I looked at her. Give me a break, I said.
*
![]()

[...] And given that I’m already more than a week behind on the promised Bolaño tribute highlights, you’ll probably want to check elsewhere before wandering the halls [...]
[...] he argued, at a National Arts Club tribute to the late writer, that the praise being heaped on Bolaño originates not with newspaper [...]